<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Thickness calculations for spectacles lenses - CLAUDIA K OPTICIANS - \\</title>
		<link>http://claudiakopticians.com/mainsite/thickness-calculations-for-spectacles-lenses/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>You can&#8217;t have high powered lenses in rimless frames, right? &#124; claudiakopticians.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://claudiakopticians.com/mainsite/?p=381#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] with a fairly high powered lens who decided he wanted just such a rimless frame. You may want to read that post again, just to refresh your memory. I am not saying everything is possible, but these days we have to say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with a fairly high powered lens who decided he wanted just such a rimless frame. You may want to read that post again, just to refresh your memory. I am not saying everything is possible, but these days we have to say [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
